🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.