Stephen Miller Escalates Assertions Regarding the Acquisition of Greenland
A key figure from Donald Trump's senior advisors has increased tensions on Denmark by challenging Denmark's sovereign claim to the vast Arctic island.
Force Deemed Unnecessary
Stephen Miller, stated emphatically the use of armed force would not be required to assume control of the Arctic territory because ânobody is going to fight the United States in combat over the fate of Greenlandâ.
âWhat do you mean military action against Greenland? Its population numbers just 30,000 inhabitants people,â Miller inaccurately claimed, despite the actual figure being closer to 57,000.
He also suggested that Copenhagen lacks a valid claim to the region, which is a one-time colonial possession and continues as a constituent country of the Kingdom of Denmark.
Escalating Diplomatic Strains
These remarks follow a period of increasing friction between the US and Denmark after the US presidentâs renewed calls to annex Greenland.
The Danish foreign policy committee has called an extraordinary meeting to examine the kingdomâs relationship with the United States.
In his interview, Miller told CNN that dominion of the island could be gained without armed conflict due to its small population.
Challenging Copenhagen's Rule
âThe core issue is on what grounds does Denmark have to assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their ownership claim?â he asked.
He added: âAs the leading power within the power of NATO. For the US to protect Arctic interests to safeguard the alliance, it is logical that Greenland should be incorporated into the United States.â
There was, he said âno requirement to even consider or discussâ a armed takeover in Greenland, reiterating: âNo country would wage war against the US militarily.â
Global Responses
These statements followed Trump said over the weekend, following events in Venezuela, that the US needed Greenland âvery badlyâ.
Denmark's leader, Mette Frederiksen, reacted by saying that an American aggression against a NATO ally would mean the end of the defensive pact and âthe postwar security orderâ.
The island's own leader, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, also made a strong statement, calling on the US president to abandon his âfantasies about annexationâ and accused the US of being âwholly inappropriateâ.
Historical Context and Current Stance
Millerâs comments were preceded by his wife, a conservative commentator, posted a map on social media of Greenland draped in a US flag with the tag âIN THE NEAR FUTUREâ.
When questioned on the online image, he responded by stating: âIt has been the official stance of the US government since the start of this presidency... The president has been explicit about that.â
The territory remained a colony until 1953, when it became part of the Danish realm. The US maintains a military base there, critical to its national missile defense network.
In recent years, there has been growing support for Greenlandic independence, especially following disclosures about Denmarkâs treatment of the local population.
But amid the prospect of acquisition talk, Greenland in March established a new coalition government in a demonstration of solidarity, with its agreement stating: âGreenland belongs to us.â